Condon v. Exton-Hall Brokerage & Vessel Agency
City of New York Municipal Court
Action to recover amount paid on policy of insurance after notice to agent to cancel.
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
The plaintiff in this action is the assignee of a claim formerly belonging to four insurance companies, so hereinafter, for a complete comprehension of the facts, when reference is made to the plaintiff, the insurance companies are intended. The defendant is a corporation doing a general insurance business, procuring insurance for clients, and acting as agents in certain cases for insurance companies, and issuing as such agents insurance policies. It is conceded in the case at bar that, the defendant company was not the general agent for the issuing of policies for any of the companies…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grossman v. . SchenkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Forster v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Thorne v. DeasNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Smedes v. President of Bank of UticaNew York Supreme Court · 1823
- Northrup v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McDonald v. North River InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Andrews v. Minter Coal & Coke Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
- Miller v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Pelaggi Co. v. Orient Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Steiner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.