Legal Opinion
(PC) Hill v. Cemo
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00789Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALAN DEAN HILL, Case No. 2:25-cv-0789-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DENNIS CEMO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff brings this action against sergeant Dennis Cemo. The allegations fail to state a 18 claim. Plaintiff may, if he chooses, file an amended complaint that addresses the deficiencies 19 noted herein. I will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 7. 20 Screening and Pleading Requirements 21 A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.