Legal Opinion
Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 2007No. A06-959PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges a district court judgment dismissing her complaint against respondents. Appellant argues that the district court erred by concluding that the tort claims alleged in her complaint were barred because she failed to assert them as counterclaims in a prior lawsuit involving the same parties. Appellant also argues that the district court erred by concluding that her non-tort claims were barred because they were ripe when she answered respondents’ third party complaint. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Respondent Asian Women United of Minnesota (“AWUM”) is a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Leiendecker v. Asian Women United of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Luisa Chavez-Lavagnino v. Motivation Education TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- In Re the Civil Commitment of TravisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Asian Women United of Minnesota v. LeiendeckerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.