Anderson v. Warren
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentCorn, J.
My objection to the majority opinion is based upon provisions of the statute and former decisions of this court, which I do not think admit of the conclusion reached therein. My views on the subject will be discussed under three propositions.
1. The judgment being in foreclosure of a real estate mortgage, the execution is special and must conform to the judgment of the court, otherwise it is contrary to the provisions of 12 O. S. 1941 § 732 and 12 O.S. 1941 § 903.
2. The execution is contrary to 12 O. S. 1941 § 760 in that the judgment was entered under the provisions thereof where the mortgage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aycock v. HarrimanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Bartlett Mortgage Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Price Et Ux. v. Citizens State Bank of MediapolisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Ashcraft v. ButtsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Richmond v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.