Legal Opinion
Larkin Group, Inc. v. Aquatic Design Consultants, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 8, 2004No. 04-2154-JWLPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
Plaintiff Larkin Group, Inc. (“Larkin”) filed this lawsuit against three of its former employees, defendants Tim Spiker, Kevin McElyea, and Joe Flanigan, and the new company that they formed, defendant Aquatic Design Consultants, Inc. (“Aquatic Design”). Plaintiff alleges that defendants Spiker, McElyea, and Flanigan unlawfully took materials from Larkin which they then used on behalf of Aquatic Design. The matter is presently before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 14) plaintiffs Lanham Act claim. For the reasons explained below,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cvent, Inc. v. Eventbrite, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010
- John Bean Technologies v. B GSE GroupDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.