Legal Opinion
Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 25, 2006No. Civil Action 04-2597PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Sunlight Saunas, Inc. filed suit against Sundance Sauna, Inc. and Brighton Sauna, Inc. for defamation, false advertising, false description and cybersquatting. Defendants filed counterclaims for false advertising. As to plaintiffs claims, on May 2, 2006, the jury found that Sundance (1) was liable for $2,500 actual damages and $150,000 punitive damages for defamation under Kansas law; (2) was liable for $1.00 actual damages for false advertising and $1.00 actual damages for false description under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq.; and (3) was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sun Banks of Florida, Inc., a Florida Corporation Etc. v. Sun Federal Savings and Loan Association, a Federal Savings and Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Joe E. Cooper, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Beer Nuts, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Clover Club Foods Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v. Kansas Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Paradigm Alliance, Inc. v. Celeritas Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Goode v. RamsaurDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- MNM Investments, LLC v. HDM, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019
- Pipeline Productions, Inc. v. The Madison Companies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020