Legal Opinion
Wright v. Johanson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1925No. 18878. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, Wright, commenced this action in the superior court for King county against the defendants, Katherine Brown Johanson and Elizabeth Brown Inglis, seeking recovery of compensation for services claimed to have been rendered by him as attorney at law for them upon a contingent fee contract. The case proceeded to trial as against the defendant Mrs. Johanson alone, which trial resulted in a verdict of a jury and a judgment rendered thereon awarding to Wright recovery as against her in the sum of $5,000, from which she has appealed to this court.
Counsel for Mrs. Johanson, by timely…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Dunn v. Hudson River Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- French v. CunninghamIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Bathgate v. . HaskinNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Ga Nun v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ross v. ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Sohn v. BrockingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Cavers v. Old National Bank & Union Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Enos v. KeatingWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Dill v. Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.