Bathgate v. . Haskin
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
I am unable to concur in the conclusion reached by the learned judge at Special Term, that the claim of the defendant Haskin, for services rendered as attorney in the suit brought by the New York and New Haven Railroad Company against these plaintiffs, was barred by the statute of limitations. That action was commenced in 1851, and Haskin was retained to defend it. Issue was joined therein, and in September, 1852, a motion was made by Haskin, in behalf of the defendants, to change the place of trial from New York to Westchester county, and, before decision, the judge before whom it was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. RobertsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
- Holbrook v. Receivers of the American Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Mygatt v. . WilcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Taylor v. RootNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Artcher v. Douglass & WickoffNew York Supreme Court · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- American Guild v. . DamonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Willoughby v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Potts v. Village of HaverstrawCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.