Legal Opinion

National Bank of Commerce of Tacoma v. Galland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1896No. 2134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — , Hon. Jesse Arthur, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

This action was brought to recover the amount alleged to be due on a promissory note made by the defendants Galland in their firm name of Gal-*503land Brothers to John Burke, which it was alleged had heen. transferred to the plaintiff hy a guaranty of payment indorsed upon the back of the note. At the time the issues upon which the cause went to trial were joined only three of the defendants had been served with process. The particular nature of the issues will sufficiently appear from wffat will be said in regard to the errors relied upon for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Cooper v. Leather Manuf'rs' Nat. BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Helena National Bank v. Rocky Mountain Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Pacific Drug Co. v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API