Legal Opinion
Wright v. Boeing Vertol Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 13, 1989No. 87-0130PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
In this action, brought under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (1982), plaintiff Robert Wright seeks to overturn a labor arbitration award sustaining plaintiff’s discharge by defendant Boeing Vertol Company (“Boeing”). Plaintiff alleges that Boeing discharged him in violation of its collective bargaining agreement with the International Union, United Automobile Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“UAW”) and Local 1069 of the UAW, that the UAW and Local 1069 breached their duty of fair representation of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robinson v. UAW LOCAL 1196District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995
- Wright (Robert) v. Boeing Vertol Company, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 1069Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989