Baum v. Wood Conversion Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, District Judge.
Each of the plaintiffs in the above entitled causes has filed a motion to remand. The corporate non-resident defendant in each case heretofore removed some of the cases upon the identical grounds stated in the removal petitions in these cases. Upon a hearing and after consideration by one of my associates, Honorable Richard M. Duncan, the cases were remanded to the state court from which removed. Thereafter a companion case was tried in a state court, and at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence the trial judge sustained a demurrer on behalf of one of the resident…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Orr v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- Polito v. MolaskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Todd v. RussellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Brusselback v. Cago CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Putterman v. DavelerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958