Legal Opinion
Todd v. Russell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 2, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
Two suits have been brought by creditors of the Ohio Joint Stock Land Bank against stockholders of that corporation to hold them liable up to the amount of their stock at par value. The bills allege that the bank was organized under the Federal Farm Loan'Act (12 USCA § 641 et seq.), with its principal place of business in Cincinnati; that it is now insolvent; and that, under the Federal Farm Loan Act (section 9 [12 USCA § 744]), the stockholders are liaable for all debts to the extent of the amount of stock owned by them at the par value thereof, $100 a share. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kirby v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Platt v. WilmotSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Benedict v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Hobbs v. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Holmberg v. AnchellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Brusselback v. Cago CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Todd v. RussellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935
- Todd v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.