Legal Opinion
H. Max Ammerman v. Lou Miller
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 17, 1970No. 22892PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
H. Max Ammerman and Josephine Ammerman, his wife, filed a complaint 1 against Lou Miller in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia seeking rescission and cancellation of two promissory notes and return of monies paid on one of such notes, and alleging as grounds therefor mistake and failure of consideration. This appeal challenges the District Court’s dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. H. Max Ammerman and Lou Miller are hereinafter called by their respective surnames.
It appears that Daniel and Janice Mel-nick,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gardner v. Toilet Goods Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Inslaw, Inc. v. United States (In Re Inslaw, Inc.)District Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- H. Max Ammerman v. Lou MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Gerrard v. BlackmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Connors v. Peles Coal Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- George R. Cogar v. William E. Schuyler, Jr., Commissioner of Patents, and Sperry Rand CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972