Inslaw, Inc. v. United States (In Re Inslaw, Inc.)
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON DENIAL OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
GEORGE F. BASON, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
This opinion explains why the Court has by separate Order denied the motion of defendants United States of America and United States Department of Justice (collectively “DOJ” or “the Government”) to dismiss the adversary proceeding advanced by plaintiff/debtor-in-possession Inslaw, Inc. (“Inslaw”).
The Court’s holding at this stage of this litigation is necessarily narrow. I am bound by the hornbook rule, as expressed in Ammerman v. Miller, 432 F.2d 621, 626 (D.C.Cir.1970), citing Conley v. Gibson, 355…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Anderson v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Inslaw, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Price v. United States (In Re Price)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- In Re PriceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Sechuan City, Inc. v. North American Motor Inns, Inc. (In Re Sechuan City, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.