Higginbotham v. Higginbotham
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. Super. 18 (1966)
222 A.2d 120
SARAH E. HIGGINBOTHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
EDWARD HUGHES HIGGINBOTHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 7, 1966.
Decided July 20, 1966.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.
Mr. John G. Dluhy argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Mervyn R. Montgomery, on the brief).
Mr. Herbert A. Vogel argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lieblich & Cole, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.
The Chancery Division judge refused to enforce the provision of a valid Florida divorce…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- McElreath v. McElreathTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Fall v. FallNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
- Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Anderson v. SombergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Day v. WiswallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Manfrini v. ManfriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.