Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Higginbotham

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 20, 1966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

92 N.J. Super. 18 (1966)

222 A.2d 120

SARAH E. HIGGINBOTHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

EDWARD HUGHES HIGGINBOTHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 7, 1966.

Decided July 20, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. John G. Dluhy argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Mervyn R. Montgomery, on the brief).

Mr. Herbert A. Vogel argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Lieblich & Cole, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

The Chancery Division judge refused to enforce the provision of a valid Florida divorce…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. McElreath v. McElreathTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Fall v. FallNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Matson v. MatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Andre v. MorrowIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Anderson v. SombergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Day v. WiswallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Chaudry v. ChaudryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Manfrini v. ManfriniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API