Fall v. Fall
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Hamilton county: Samuel H. Sornborger, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSedgwick, J.
This controversy relates to a quarter section of land in Hamilton county. The plaintiff bases her right in the land upon a decree of the superior court of King county in the state of Washington. In 1876 the plaintiff and Edmund W. Pall intermarried in the state of Indiana. Afterwards they removed to this state and became the owners of the quarter section of land now in controversy. After residing here for some years they removed to the state of Washington, and, being residents there, an action for divorce was begun by the plaintiff’s then husband. In this action she answered, denying that any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Ellenwood v. Marietta Chair Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Streitwolf v. StreitwolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Fall v. EastinSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McElreath v. McElreathTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re Marriage of FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Meador v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.