Legal Opinion
In Re Geiger
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 22, 2001No. 19-11627PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the court is the motion filed by Associates Home Equity Consumer Discount Company (“Movant”) 1 requesting relief from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1). Movant seeks relief from the automatic stay so that it may pursue its in rem, state court foreclosure rights against the collateral arguing that its lien survived the plan confirmation process and that its interests are not adequately protected. Because we find that Movant’s lien survived the plan confirmation process and that Movant’s interests are not adequately protected, we…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re Benjamin Pierce Simmons, Bankrupt. Benjamin Pierce Simmons v. J.T. SavellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Fred J. Szostek, Denise M. SzostekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Cen-Pen Corporation v. Walter E. Hanson Loraine P. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- In the Matter of Walter Howard and Verlean Howard, Debtors. Sun Finance Company, Inc. v. Walter Howard and Verlean HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Estate Of Roger LellockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2010
- In Re WagnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- In Re ZimmermanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001
- In Re VankellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2004
- In Re VenutoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.