Legal Opinion
In Re Venuto
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 6, 2006No. 14-19601PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ERIC L. FRANK, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Debtors Charles and Patricia Venuto (“the Debtors”) have moved to reopen their closed chapter 13 case to obtain further relief from this court. More specifically, the Debtors request that I reopen their bankruptcy case to enter an order staying a sheriffs sale of their residence which is presently scheduled for June 9, 2006. The Debtors contend that the sale has been scheduled in violation of their rights under their confirmed chapter 13 plan, this court’s confirmation order and this court’s chapter 13 discharge order entered…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re: Combustion Engineering, Inc. First State Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Bessette v. AVCO Financial Services Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- David J. Pertuso, Karen A. Pertuso v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- In Re Resorts International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re OrawskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In re HeinzleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2014
- Thomas v. City of Philadelphia (In re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- In Re PadillaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.