Legal Opinion
In Re Hill
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
Decided November 29, 2010No. 19-00373PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON LIEN STRIP AND CONFIRMATION OF PLAN
MARGARET M. MANN, Bankruptcy-Judge.
Debtors William Hill and Kathleen Hill (“the Debtors”) filed this Chapter 13 case five days after they received a Chapter 7 discharge in a previous case- — a sequence of events colloquially described as a “Chapter 20” case. See Grandstaff v. Casey (In re Casey), 428 B.R. 519, 521 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.2010). In their Chapter 20 case, the Debtors seek to confirm their Chapter 13 plan and strip 1 the junior lien of CIT/Vericrest Financial, Inc. (“CIT”) against their principal residence pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n v. Blendheim (In Re Blendheim)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Fisette v. Keller (In Re Fisette)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- In Re OkosisiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- In Re GerardinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2011
- In Re JenningsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.