Legal Opinion

Warren v. Del Pizzo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1980No. A7905-02179, CA 15582PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit for declaratory and injunctive relief to determine the validity of an amendment to the Declaration of Restrictions for a 25-lot subdivision in east Multnomah County known as Lachenview. The amendment purported to eliminate height restrictions contained in the original declaration.

Following cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court held that the amendment eliminating the height restriction was valid. Plaintiffs appeal from that decree, assigning as error the following:

1) Concluding that the original restriction permitted amendment of the height restriction;

2)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snashall Et Ux v. Jewell Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sharp v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Ardmore Park Subdivision Ass'n, Inc. v. SimonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Walton v. JaskiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Maatta v. Dead River Campers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Warren v. Del PizzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API