Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Gillette-Herzog Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 3, 1904No. Nos. 13,714—(8)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $2,117.40 premiums alleged to be due upon certain policies of indemnity insurance issued to defendant. The case was tried before Harrison, J., who found in favor of defendant. . From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Plaintiff is a corporation writing insurance against liability from accidents occurring to employees and others for the benefit of the em*275ployer. Defendant during the year 1897 was engaged in the business of operating a foundry and machine shop in Minneapolis, as well as in'the erection of bridges and architectural ironwork construction at all places where employed for that purpose. Its business was divided 'into separate departments, conducted under the same management, and operated through the same office force, who kept its accounts with customers. In January, 1897, plaintiff issued to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perkins v. TrinkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Hinkle v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Erkens v. NicolinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  4. Hall v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Hanley v. NoyesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warren v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Peterson v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Kiefer Oil & Gas Co. v. McDougalCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  4. Daly v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Becthold v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API