Hinkle v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
In June, 1881, the plaintiff, who was in the employ of the defendant as a locomotive engineer, was injured by the breaking down of a turn-table, upon which his engine was standing. After some seven weeks of disability by reason of tbe accident, he resumed work in the service of the defendant. This action was subsequently commenced to recover for such injuries, which are claimed to have been of a serious and permanent character. The cause of action alleged is negligence of the defendant in respect to the condition of the turn-table. The answer put in issue the responsibility of the defend*435ant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hutchins v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Och v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Mateer v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Bowman v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.