Legal Opinion
State v. Thomas
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 4, 2012No. AC 33047PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*784 Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant, Dereck Thomas, appeals from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court after his plea of nolo contendere. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court violated his rights to due process and protection against double jeopardy by (1) failing to sentence him in accordance with the plea agreement, (2) vacating his accepted plea and (3) failing to follow the mandatory provisions of the rules of practice. Because our Supreme Court determined in the interlocutory appeal of the defendant that jeopardy did not attach to the court’s conditional…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Lewis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. AillonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HerediaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Shipman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017