Legal Opinion
State v. Joyner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 2001No. SC 16297PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
This appeal concerns the possible collateral estoppel effect of a ruling by a habeas court on a subsequent criminal retrial. The defendant, Angelo Joyner, who, after a first trial, was convicted of, inter alia, sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 53a-70,1 filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The habeas court granted the defendant’s petition on the grounds that the defendant’s trial counsel, Samuel Dixon, had had a conflict of interest and had provided ineffective assistance to the defendant. Accordingly, the habeas…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wanamaker v. Town of Westport Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Corcoran v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Book v. Mortgage Electronic Registration SystemsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Mexico Construction & Paving v. Thompson (In re Thompson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.