Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1948No. 31884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

We will not here either specifically or substantially, set forth the evidence. It is conflicting. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Counsel for the defendant, we think very properly, admit that the general grounds and the ruling of the court on the demurrers and the motion overruling the objections to the allowance of the amendment of the plaintiff, which exceptions are properly preserved pendente lite, are so closely related that they may be considered together. In other words, if the court did not commit reversible error in overruling the demurrers and in overruling the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Hyde v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Milltown Lumber Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Golatt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moffett v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Knox Enterprises v. Timbermen, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Moffett v. McCurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API