Legal Opinion

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Tate

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. December 8, 1906.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

This is an action by Winnie Tate, Mary B. Tate, Susan A. Tate, Arthur H. Tate, Caleb R. Tate, Samuel Tate, and Winnie Tate as next friend of Daniel J., Willie C., and Winnie Tate, against the Western and Atlantic Railroad Company, to recover damages resulting from the firing of the growing timber upon land owned by the petitioners, by sparks emitted in the negligent operation of the defendant’s train of cars.

1. A new trial is asked, “because, as movant insists, the plaintiffs brought and have prosecuted their said action as joint owners of the lands and timber growing thereon, described in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Samuel v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  2. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KohlrussSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. McIntire v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Welton v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Milltown Lumber Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Brown v. Service Coach Lines Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  5. Bell v. FitzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API