Moffett v. McCurry
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant assigns error on the overruling of its general demurrer, which contended that it affirmatively appeared in the petition that the plaintiff could have avoided any injury and damage which he may have sustained had he exercised ordinary care and diligence. “Questions as to diligence and negligence, including contributory negligence and what negligence constitutes the proximate cause of the injury complained of, are questions peculiarly for the jury, such as this court will decline to solve on demurrer except in palpably clear, plain, and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. HarbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Tybee Amusement Co. v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Olliff v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Limbert v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Stanley v. SquadritoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Duke Trucking Co. v. GilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Howard v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.