Legal Opinion
Moffett v. McCurry
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 21, 1951No. 33544Published
1Opinion of the Court
84 Ga. App. 853 (1951)
67 S.E.2d 807
MOFFETT et al.
v.
McCURRY.
33544.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Decided November 21, 1951.
Martin, Snow & Grant, for plaintiffs in error.
John D. Mattox, Turpin & Lane, contra.
WORRILL, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) 1. The defendant assigns error on the overruling of its general demurrer, which contended that it affirmatively appeared in the petition that the plaintiff could have avoided any injury and damage which he may have sustained had he exercised ordinary care and diligence. "Questions as to diligence and negligence, including contributory negligence…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. HarbinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Tybee Amusement Co. v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Olliff v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.