Mel H. Binning, Inc. v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
—Plaintiff appeals from judgment of the Alameda County Superior Court of dismissal of the action after sustaining of the demurrer to the third amended complaint.
Issue Presented
Does the third amended complaint state a cause of action in fraud?
Record
On March 12, 1976, plaintiff filed a third amended complaint for damages in which it was alleged that on or about September 17, 1976, plaintiff suffered a serious fire at its leased premises caused by a defective coffee maker made and distributed by the defendants Brewmatic Company, Farmer Brothers Coffee Company, and Custom Coffee…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & BaerwitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of ModestoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Zahn v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Spencer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by7 opinions
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Downing v. Travelers InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Lewis v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Geraci v. United Services Automobile Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Arutyun Darakchyan v. State Farm General Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.