Legal Opinion
Zahn v. Canadian Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 21, 1976No. Civ. 46296PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COMPTON, J.
June Zahn and Joseph Zahn, plaintiffs in an action instituted by a complaint captioned “Complaint for Personal Injuries, Negligence and Breach of Contractual Duty of Good Faith,” appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of two named defendants —Richard Hartnett and Canadian Indemnity Insurance Company (Canadian).
The litigation had its genesis in a collision between an automobile operated by Joseph Zahn and in which his wife June was a passenger and an automobile driven by one Sara Peet. The latter is also named as a defendant in the complaint and the action based on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & GladstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Harris v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.