Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided September 3, 1976PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, III, Judge.
The plaintiffs, William J. Haynes, Jr., and Carol Donaldson Haynes, filed suit against Cumberland Builders for fraudulent misrepresentation in a land sales transaction. The Chancellor rendered a judgment for the plaintiffs on the ground of misrepresentation or mutual mistake. The defendant has appealed from this judgment.
On July 24, 1974, the plaintiffs-appellees entered into a contract to purchase a house and lot, more particularly described as Lot No. 34, Gold Key Estate Subdivision, from the defendant-appellant for $35,000.00. The property was conveyed to the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Black v. Love & Amos Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
- Dozier v. Hawthorne Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
- Shwab v. WaltersTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Jasper Aviation, Inc. v. McCollum Aviation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Brown v. Birman Managed Care, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Weisman v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.