Legal Opinion
Dozier v. Hawthorne Development Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided June 26, 1953PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPelts', J.
The hill herein was filed by Culver B. Dozier and his wife, Margaret T. Dozier, to rescind a conveyance of .a house and lot made to them by the Hawthorne Development Company, to recover what they had paid on account of the purchase, and to obtain other incidental relief. The ground of relief alleged was that they had been induced to purchase the property by certain false and fraudulent representations hereinafter set out.
The property was Lot No. 17 on the Plan of Glen Echo Subdivision, a new suburban residential area in the Seventh District of Davidson County, developed by the Hawthorne…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Simmons Et Ux. v. Evans Et UxTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Domestic Sewing Machine Co. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. TuckerTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Young v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
- Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- Atkins v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- MacOn County Livestock Market, Inc. v. Kentucky State Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Rita C. O'neal, Cross-Appellant v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc., and General Foods Corporation, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.