Legal Opinion

Hardenbrook v. Town of Ligonier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1884No. 11,286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint of the appellee sets forth at length an ordinance adopted by the board of trustees of the town of Ligonier requiring license from venders of intoxicating liquors, avers that the town was duly incorporated, and charges that the appellant violated the provisions of the ordinance by selling liquor in dess quantities than a quart without a license.

It is not necessary that a complaint for the violation of a town ordinance should aver that the board was duly elected; it is enough to allege that the ordinance was enacted by the trustees of the corporation. A defendant in an action to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCool v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Lower v. WallickIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Turner v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Green v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Bogart v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1848

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Griffee v. Town of SummitvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. City of Hammond v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Vinson v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Town of SalemIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. In re Roe ChungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API