Legal Opinion

City of Hammond v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1891No. 14,908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Porter Circuit Court.-

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— This is an appeal from a judgment against a municipal corporation, rendered in an action wherein the corporation sought to recover a penalty for the violation of one of its ordinances.

No question as to the power of the municipality to enact *598the ordinance is directly or indirectly presented. The only question presented is whether the facts stated in the special finding entitle the appellant to recover the penalty. In our opinion the jurisdiction of the case is in the Appellate Court. The case was decided upon the theory that the facts did not show a violation of the ordinance, and hence the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Citizens' Gas & Mining Co. v. Town of ElwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bogart v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  4. City of Goshen v. CroxtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. City of Greensburgh v. CorwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Hammond v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Benedict v. FarlowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. City of Greensburg v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Curless v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API