Legal Opinion

Griffee v. Town of Summitville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1894No. 1,320PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

This action was instituted by appellee against appellant, before a justice of the peace, to recover the penalty prescribed for the violation of an ordinance of said town. Judgment was there rendered against appellant for two dollars, the amount of the penalty specified in the ordinance, for the offense charged, from which he appealed to the circuit court, where, on trial by a jury, verdict was returned against him for two dollars, *333on which judgment was pronounced, from which appellant attempted to prosecute this appeal. No question involving the validity of the ordinance has been raised. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Greensburgh v. CorwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Dailey v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Hardenbrook v. Town of LigonierIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Bosworth v. Wayne Pike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wirgau v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Biedinger v. City of East ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Colliery Engineer Co. v. American Car & Foundry Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Jerzakowski v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API