In re Roe Chung
New Mexico Supreme Court
Prohibition. Application of Roe Cluing, for a writ of prohibition, to H. H. Ribble, a justice of the peace for precinct No. 26, Bernalillo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The law under which the actions complained of in the petition, sections 7, 8, 9, act February 27, 1895, is contradictory, inconsistent and unconstitutional. State y. Barlow, 91 N. O. 550; Const. U. S. Amend., art. 8; Comp.
Read the full summary
Prohibition. Application of Roe Cluing, for a writ of prohibition, to H. H. Ribble, a justice of the peace for precinct No. 26, Bernalillo County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The law under which the actions complained of in the petition, sections 7, 8, 9, act February 27, 1895, is contradictory, inconsistent and unconstitutional. State y. Barlow, 91 N. O. 550; Const. U. S. Amend., art. 8; Comp. Laws 1884, sec. 2594. The court of the justice of the peace has no jurisdiction to try and determine said causes. 12 Am. and Eng. Ency. of Law 247; Succession of Weigle, 17 La.…
1Opinion of the CourtColliek, J.
Imprisonment for debt: act Feb. 27,1S95: construction. Tbe application for a writ of prohibition was made in vacation to the Honorable H. B. Hamilton, one of the justices of this court,under section 2006 of the Compiled Laws of New Mexico 1884, who, instead of granting the wit, and making it returnable to the next regular term of this court, ordered a rule to issue to respondent, H. H. Kibble, justice of the peace, for him to show cause at the beginning of this term, why such application should not be granted. This court decided to treat this application as if it were made to the court in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ex parte HollwedellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
- Hardenbrook v. Town of LigonierIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex parte ReedU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1835
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Burroughs v. WebsterIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- State v. AstorgaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2015