In re the Personal Restraint of Finstad
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
González, J.
¶1 This case squarely asks whether petitioners collaterally challenging judgments and sentences based on a failure to follow statutory sentencing procedures must show that they were prejudiced by the claimed error. In 2007, Lowell Deray Finstad faced at least seven felony charges. After he was convicted by a jury on two of the charges, he and the State negotiated a global plea agreement on the remaining charges. The agreement likely resulted in less prison time for Finstad, and in exchange, Finstad agreed to dismiss his appeal of his jury convictions. Under the agreement, most of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Oregon v. IceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- In re the Personal Restraint of FairclothCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Steven James Van NoyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- In re Personal Restraint of D'AllesandroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.