Legal Opinion
Local 194 C & T, United Transportation Union v. Consolidated Rail Corporation and United Transportation Union
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 5, 1982No. 81-1592PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Local 194 C & T of the United Transportation Union (“Local 194”) brought this action challenging the lawfulness of an agreement entered into by the Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) and the United Transportation Union (“UTU”). The agreement allocated among various employee groups, including Local 194, work that had been consolidated under the authority of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973, 45 U.S.C. §§ 701-794 (1976) (the “Act”). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants Conrail and UTU, upholding the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Andrews v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Gunther v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. American Train Dispatchers Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. MulliganSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1985