Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Mulligan
Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act
Decided June 24, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 83-15Published
1Opinion of the Court
GASCH, Presiding Judge:
This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”) for summary judgment. Conrail has filed this action for declaratory and injunctive relief aimed at barring defendant Christopher J. Mulligan1 from pursuing certain arbitration proceedings he initiated in an effort to receive benefits pursuant to Title V of the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 (“RRRA”).2 The Court heard oral argument on plaintiff’s motion on May 14, 1985. For the reasons stated below, Conrail’s motion is granted.
*403BACKGROUND
On March 29, 1982,3…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES'ASS'N v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.