Legal Opinion

Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 16, 1985No. C79-1230PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Under well-settled rules, the Court may grant summary judgment only if one of the moving parties has proven that it is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law upon facts to which no genuine issue of materiality exists. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants partial summary judgment for the plaintiffs in this action.

I

The above-captioned case was commenced by the plaintiffs under the Vietnam Veteran’s Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, 38 U.S.C. § 2021 et…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. SissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API