Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corp. v. American Train Dispatchers Ass'n
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 15, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 81-2039Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) and the American Train Dispatchers Association (ATDA), come before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, Conrail’s motion for summary judgment is granted and ATDA’s motion is denied.
ATDA entered into a collective bargaining agreement with Conrail’s predecessor, the Pennsylvania Railroad. Conrail, a product of the Regional Railway Reorganization Act of 1973, 45 U.S.C. §§ 701, 741 (1976) (RRR Act), was required to assume all of the obligations under that collective bargaining…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. A. P. W. Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.