Legal Opinion

Dance v. Board of Education of City of M'boro

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 3, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sims

Reversing.

Appellants, William E. Dance and William H. Mar-cum, partners doing business under the firm name of Dance & Marcum, who will be referred to interchangeably as plaintiffs, partnership and contractors, entered into a written contract with the Board of Education of the City of Middlesboro who will be referred to interchangeably as defendant and the board, for the construction of a school building at a cost of $70,026.89 under the supervision of WPA which was furnishing the greater part of the money to pay for the project. Attached to the contract were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kansas City Bridge Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  2. County Board of Education v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Shields v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Pittsburgh Filter Manufacturing Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Rockport Coal Co.'s Trustee in Bankruptcy v. TilfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Henke Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  2. City of Erlanger v. BerkemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Alexander v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Lone Jack Graded School Dist. v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947
  5. Hocker v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API