Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Filter Manufacturing Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 22, 1917PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Cironit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*555Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Settle

Affirming.

The Frankfort Water Company, desiring to build a filter plant at its pump-house on the Lawrenceburg pike near the city of Frankfort, in 1912 employed the appellant, the Pittsburgh Filter Manufacturing Company, to construct the filter plant at the price of $65,-000.00, plus necessary extra work. The appellee, D. D. Smith, contracted with the appellant, Pittsburgh Filter Manufacturing Company, to do all the work of excavation for the foundation and bed of the plant, at the price of $1.00 per cubic yard, to be completed December 1st, 1912.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Runyon v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Martin v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Goff v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Abram v. MallicoatCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Gusler v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. Housing Authority of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Wehr Constructors, Inc. v. Steel Fabricators, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
  3. Dance v. Board of Education of City of M'boroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  4. Clark County Construction Co. v. State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Jarosz v. Caesar Realty, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API