Garrett v. Atlanta Home Underwriters
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. In a trover suit, where there is an allegation and proof as to the value of the property, the plaintiff, after the close of the argument and before the case is submitted to the jury, may elect to take a money verdict and the defendant can not complain upon the ground that the election is too late and that he had not been given an opportunity to argue the question of value to the jury. Especially is this true when the defendant made no objection when the election was made. Holland v. Lawrence, 147 Ga. 479 (94 S. E. 561); Young v. Durham, 15 Ga. App. 678 (84 S. E. 165).
2. Where the plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Young v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. WoodleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bank of Blakely v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Holland v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commercial Auto Loan Corp. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Douglas Motor Co. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- Youngblood v. RuisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Woodbury v. Atlanta Dental Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Brooks v. Hartsfield Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.