Commercial Auto Loan Corp. v. Baker
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
The plaintiff in this action (defendant in error), Baker, contends: that the note and conditional bill of sale to secure a debt never had any inception, for the simple reason that it shows that, because of the non-performance of the condition precedent, there is no contract in existence, and that therefore there is nothing to which to apply the exclnding-evidence rule; that he signed some printed forms leaving blanks therein to be filled in; that the defendant (plaintiff in error), Commercial Auto Loan Corporation, hereinafter called the “Loan Company,” filled in these blanks contrary to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Holmes v. Langston & WoodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Chicago Building & Manufacturing Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- O'Neill Manufacturing Co. v. WoodleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
- Roper Wholesale Grocery Co. v. FaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schick Oil & Gas, Inc. Ex Rel. Mahaffey v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Schick Oil & Gas, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1983
- City of Gainesville v. PritchettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Vandiver v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Interstate Financial Corp. v. AppelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Youngblood v. RuisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.