Legal Opinion
Woods, Housing Expediter v. Ginocchio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1950No. 12234PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
The Expediter appeals from a judgment refusing him an injunction restraining appellee landlord from charging in excess of the maximum rent fixed upon the landlord’s housing accommodation in Reno, Nevada, by the Rent Director for that area. The judgment denied further equitable relief, refusing to order the landlord to pay to her tenant the sum of $1100.00 alleged excess rentals charged her tenant.
The court, in denying the equitable relief, held that the premises were not within the Expediter’s jurisdiction for the fixing of this maximum rent because they were additional…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Prendergast v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Comprehensive Group Health Services Board Directors v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. Fritz Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
- Grosz v. ConserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Bray v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Feeley v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.