Legal Opinion
United States v. Fritz Properties, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 13, 1950No. 29079-E, 29113-EPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERSKINE, District Judge.
This action charges a violation of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended by the Housing and Rent Act of 1949. The defendant maintains that the accommodations concerned are decontrolled by virtue of Section 202(c) (1) (A) of the 1949 Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1892, which reads as follows:
“The term ‘controlled housing accommodations’ means housing accommodations in any defense-rental area, except that it does not include — -
“(1) (A) those housing accommodations, in any establishment * * * which is commonly known as a hotel in the community in which it is located…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harrell's Candy Kitchen, Inc. v. SARASOTA-MANATEE AIR. AUTH.Supreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Lichten v. Eastern Airlines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- United States Ex Rel. Wakely v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- State Ex Rel. State Corp. Commission v. ZinnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.