Legal Opinion
Grosz v. Conser
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1951No. File 9162PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The questions presented in this appeal from a judgment of eviction in an action in forcible entry and detainer arise under the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix, § 1881 et seq., which Act functions to control rents and regulate evictions of housing accommodations in defense-rental areas.
The Act includes the following provisions:
“(b) The term ‘housing accommodations’ means any building, structure, or part thereof, * * * rented or offered for rent for living or dwelling purposes (including houses, apartments, rooming- or boarding-house accommodations, and other properties used…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Koepke v. FontecchioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Gates v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Woods v. Benson Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Balogh v. CrotCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gottschalk v. EIEGGSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Zar v. South Dakota Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Blanco Rojo v. Administración de Estabilización EconómicaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1968
- González Vda. de Hernández v. Pérez ColónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
- B. Fortaleza Corp. v. Bouzá AlonsoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.