Legal Opinion
Mathieson Alkali Works, Inc. v. Crowley
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 11, 1943No. 8220PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Associate Justice.
This is a patent interference case, involving a method of producing an alkali metal sulphide by reacting an alkali metal amalgam with an aqueous solution of the corresponding alkali metal polysulphide. Invention is conceded. Appellant is the assignee of George L. Cunningham, who filed his application on February 4, 1936. Appellee is the Alien Property Custodian, who claims through Luigi Achille, the assignee of Enzo Lanzetti, whose United States application was filed on April 15, 1936, and whose Italian application was filed on June 15, 1935. It is conceded that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ercoli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- City of Spokane Falls v. CurryWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- McCurdy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larsen v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated v. Hughes Aircraft Company, and General Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1954
- Polaroid Corp. v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945