Taber v. Eyler
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHufe, C. J.
The appellants, C. C. Taber and wife, Bertie Taber, sued Charles Eyler, W. M. Burwell, and N. E. Hord, for breach of a lease contract. The allegation of the petition is, in effect, that on the 11th day of November, 1910, appellants leased to Charles Eyler, lot No. 11, block No. 32, Glidden & Sanborn addition to the city of Amarillo, of of the dimensions 30x140 feet, with a certain two-story building situated thereon, and certain additions thereto, a part of which was then leased from appellants by other parties, and by the terms of the lease the entire lot, with all improvements thereon, were…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Buchanan v. Burnett and WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Labbe v. CorbettTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Conn v. HaganTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Smith v. Traders National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1889
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- White v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Indiahoma Refining Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Street v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.